I don't understand all of the hype relating to an Assassin's Creed in Japan. How would Ubisoft even incorporated the whole Assassins theme into any time period of Japan (specifically Fuedal Japan). Japan already had its own "assassins" - ninjas (unless you're telling me the ninjas WERE the Assassins, which would lead to shoddy one-dimensional gameplay extremely similar to other ninja games). There's just too many things wrong with making an AC game set in Japan, and on top of what I've already mentioned, a game set is Japan is the #1 game that Ubisoft WON'T make, as it's what everyone expects the most.
... Now China. Oh man is ancient China a glorious idea for a setting. Ancient China had a much larger diversity in weapons (compared to anci…Read more >
Assassin's Creed III is on its way, and there could possibly be another game to follow up on AC III, similar to Assassin's Creed II. But what's going to happen after Ubisoft is done with the assassins? I was thinking maybe they could make a Templar game. It would be a new experience. It could be like an alternate timeline where the Templars succeed in controlling mankind. I think it would be a great idea for a game after the Assassins Creed series is through, and Ubisoft could profit from it.
I know that this is going to come up some where in this blog, so I'll go on and put my input in about this game.
The First Templar is technically 'A Templar game', but Ubisoft 1. Didn't make the game and 2. Could make a better Templar game in my opinion. …
Read more >