Talk:Story

From Assassin's Creed Wiki

The Sci-fi bit needs to either be deleted, or completely re-written, as it is out of date. The sequel hypotheses hardly belong in the Story section, and should be moved or removed. LTerminus

The last paragraph in the Plot section seems VERY similar to that of Wikipedia's. It should be discussed whether or not it should be deleted and re-written due to possible copywrite infringement.

Agreed. Also, the text seems to be centered around a OR-like Atheistic View Point, solely. I believe that it should be implemented that these characters are at the Liberty of the Player to be believed them or not. After all, Mualim had lied before, and his "True intentions" revealed still does not make him accurate. The Pieces of Eden are strongly not likely to have altered everyone's minds to "cover up a lie."--Eguls 21:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

[edit] About the last theory in the sequels section

"In addition to all of this, there is a triangle of text on one of the walls, which reads: "They drained my soul and made it theirs. I drained my body to show you where I saw it." There is a strong chance that this refers to something highly important... the Holy Grail, perhaps?"

I think this text was more to do with Subject 16 turning insane due to the Animus, thus "draining my soul", and the part about "draining my body" was to do with Subject 16 drawing all the pictures in blood. When Desmond starts using the Eagle's Vision and sees the pictures for the first time, he comments along the lines of "Is that..is that blood?" 58.179.85.23 15:26, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Origin of the 'Pieces of Eden'

Perhaps we could a section speculating the origins of the Pieces of Eden?

Is there any known clues within the game?