Assassin's Creed Wiki
Register
Advertisement
Assassin's Creed Wiki

This is the discussion page for Ankh.
Here, you may discuss improving the article.
To discuss the subject itself, use the Forums.

  • Be polite
  • Assume good faith
  • Do not insult other people

The Ankh and the Shroud[]

They seem to be the same thing, they can both temporarily resurrect the dead and heal the user. Does the Ankh have the side effects that the shroud has? RomanEagle 13:19, December 28, 2011 (UTC)

The Shroud cannot resurect the dead. It can heal, and sometimes reanimate life for a short time. Think of Jesus after he died. He only came back for 3 days. And Brutus? He didn't come back to life at all, his eyes opened, but then he just died again. The Shroud also called Giovanni Borgia :FLAWED MATERIAL" when he was an infant since he was deformed. Thus it cannot stop or reverse death truly. It is a machine of healing above all. The Ankh seems to overlap its piwers slightly, but with true ressurection a possibility. As for its side effects, we haven't a clue 50.71.15.60 05:03, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

Oh god, I hope the ankh won't have the same side effects as resurrecting the dead has in Pet Cemetery. Please no creepy zombie children in AC :P StPerkele 14:16, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

I'm really sorry to reveal things but for the good of Wikia Assassin's Creed. I discovered that Ankh of the 21st century and into the hands of Desmond Miles so he would like the apple of Ezio and Ankh Inconnu-dark 12:21, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

Nowhere is the Ankh stated to be in the possession of Desmond Miles, at least in any canonical sources. Slate Vesper 18:04, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

if before the end of Volume 3 accipiter it shows that Desmondwould like the Ankh Inconnu-dark 21:34, January 13, 2012 (UTC)

I don't get what that's supposed to mean. From what you're saying, it still doesn't sound like Desmond owns the Ankh. Slate Vesper 21:50, January 13, 2012 (UTC)

you read the comics in French Assassin's Creed AccipiterInconnu-dark 01:45, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

Desmond's story from the french comic is non-canon. And it stays out of the articles.. --Vatsa (talkGentek) 04:37, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

Rename?[]

Wouldn't it be better to rename the article to the "Ankh of Eden", since the artifact seems to be comprised of the same material as the other Pieces of Eden? After all, I'd say that the reason why the Crystal Skulls are named that way is because they're made out of a crystal like substance, as opposed to the golden metal that this and the other Pieces of Eden are made of. Slate Vesper 19:39, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

No. It is never called the "Ankh of Eden." Same applies to the Crystal Skulls. Plus we don't know what material it is made of; anything is speculative. -- Master Sima Yi 20:32, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

The Ankh isn't considered canon right?[]

Cause in Rogue when Berg went to retrieve it he realized it doesn't even exist. Qwert1225 (talk) 16:32, August 9, 2017 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Qwert1225 (talkcontributions) 14:27, August 9, 2017 (UTC).

Please sign your posts. And yes, the Ankh exists. Berg didn't "realize" anything, it was Violet who strongly suspected that the artefact didn't exist, mostly because they couldn't find anything concrete about it. The Wikia Editor (talk) 17:58, August 9, 2017 (UTC)
  Okay it exists but the French comics aren't canon right?So the Ankh exists but it will be having it's own story ..right? Qwert1225 (talk) 16:32, August 9, 2017 (UTC)
As has already been discussed on a thread, Aymar's statement about the French comics' continuity is too vague to be conclusive. Ubisoft's official stance is that the comics' modern day storyline isn't canon, but the historical parts are. It's still possible to feature the Ankh in another story, they can simply say that it was removed from Aquilus' grave sometime in or before the 14th century. The Wikia Editor (talk) 18:49, August 9, 2017 (UTC)
      
    I see,but would you recommend me reading the comics or are they not so very important?Qwert1225 (talk) 16:58, August 9, 2017 (UTC)
They're decent, I suppose. Not really all that important though. It's unfortunate that they didn't bring back more elements and characters from the comics' non-canon modern day. Jonathan Hawk's storyline is pretty fun and it would be nice if he's brought into canon at some point in the future . The Wikia Editor (talk) 19:07, August 9, 2017 (UTC)
  Understood,thanksQwert1225 (talk) 17:09, August 9, 2017 (UTC)
"Ubisoft's official stance is that the comics' modern day storyline isn't canon, but the historical parts are" Well ... Aymar is the highest authority over the canon. Spanish assassin NEVADO BANNER(Talk) 12:03, August 10, 2017 (UTC)

This type of discussion is best located in the forums section. Article talk pages are supposed to be used to discuss changes to an article. --Crimson Knight Intercom 17:35, August 10, 2017 (UTC)

Agreed, there is already a thread for this topic, so if anything else needs to be said about it, it should be said there. The Wikia Editor (talk) 19:42, August 10, 2017 (UTC)

Canon?[]

Due to the Resurrection Plot with Gamal's knowledge of Isis' use of it and the story, is it now canon or just still unconfirmed? Batfan13 (talk) 14:32, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Until we have an actual Isu source or pov confirm it any thing supposed by humans is just that, supposition. Lacrossedeamon (talk) 02:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Advertisement